Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Technology Branch Washington DC 20226 May 19, 1996 To whom it may concern: On February 28, 1996 I submitted the below letter to your office. As of this date I have not received any response, so I am submitting it again. I had some questions regarding the application of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. 1. Would a semi-automatic rifle, capable of accepting a detachable magazine, be considered a semi-automatic assault weapon if it had both a pistol grip and a threaded muzzle with a muzzle brake or similar device, but not a flash hider, permanently attached (by welding or silver soldering) to the threads? This firearm would not have a bayonet mount, folding or collapsing stock, or grenade launcher features. 2. Can a FFL dealer procure a semi-automatic assault rifle, made after the enactment of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, for a non-law enforcement customer who wishes to remove all parts from the gun, except the receiver (which would be retained by the dealer), for use as spare parts for a semiautomatic assault weapon made before the Act took effect? 3. Could that dealer then sell the stripped receiver created in number 2, above, to a second customer, who is also not a law enforcement officer or entity, for use as a spare part, or for building up a rifle that is not covered by the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994? 4. Could a FFL dealer acquire a semi-automatic assault weapon, made after the enactment of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, and remove from it the features that put it within the Act, and then sell it to a non-law enforcement customer? For example, could a dealer acquire a Colt AR-15 type semi-automatic assault rifle, replace the collapsing stock with a fixed one, remove the bayonet mount and threaded muzzle, and then sell it as an ordinary rifle without violating the Act? Your assistance with these queries would be appreciated. Sincerely, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS WASHINGTON, DC 20226 JUL 11 1996 E:CE:F:TE:RDC 3311 Name Address Dear: This refers to your letter of May 19, 1996 in which you ask numerous questions regarding The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (18 U.S.C., Chapter 44, as amended by Public Law 103-322). A semiautomatic rifle capable of accepting a detachable magazine and having a threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash suppressor would be an assault weapon as defined in the above statute. A rifle would not be considered to have a threaded barrel if threads were covered by a muzzle brake which was permanently attached to the barrel by welding or high temperature (1,100 degrees Fahrenheit) silver solder. The muzzle brake must not additionally function as a flash hider or grenade launcher. 18 U.S.C. section 922(v) prohibits the manufacture, transfer, and possession of semiautomatic assault weapons. The term "semiautomatic assault weapon" is defined to include 19 named models of firearms as well as semiautomatic rifles with the ability to accept a detachable magazine and having at least two of the features specified in the law. Exceptions from the prohibitions of the law are provided for weapons lawfully possessed under Federal law on the date of enactment (September 13, 1994) and weapons manufactured for sale to government entities and law enforcement officers employed by such entities for official use. The regulations implementing the law require manufacturers and dealers who transfer assault weapons to dealers who transfer assault weapons to dealers [sic] for resale to obtain evidence that the weapons will be disposed of in accordance with the law. For example, such evidence may consist of a contract between the manufacturer and the dealer stating that sales will be made to government agencies and law enforcement officers employed by such agencies or a letter from a dealer to a manufacturer stating that the dealer will only dispose of the weapons to such purchasers. The regulations require that such evidence be retained in licensees' permanent records. A transfer of semiautomatic assault rifles manufactured after September 13, 1994, would be unlawful unless the transfer was for one of the exempt purposes specified in the law. A dealer who acquired such weapons for purposes of disassembly and sale of the parts would violate the law. Since the dealer's possession of the weapons would not be for one of the exempt purposes in the law, the dealer's possession would be unlawful. Enclosed for your information is a pamphlet entitled "SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPONS and LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICES." We trust the foregoing has been responsive to you inquiry. If we may be of further assistance, please contact us. Sincerely yours, [signed] Edward M. Owen, Jr. Chief, Firearms Technology Branch