DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS WASHINGTON, DC 20226 JUN 22 2000 903050:CHB 3311 Dear Mr. Bardwell: This refers to your letter of May 30, 2000, in which you asked about modifying a magazine. As defined in section 921(a)(31) of Title 18, United States Code (U.S.C.), the term large capacity ammunition feeding device - (A) means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device manufactured after the date of enactment of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 [September 13, 1994] that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition; but (B) does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition. It is generally unlawful for a person to transfer or possess a large capacity ammunition feeding device as provided in 18 U.S.C. section 922(w). A 9mm 20 shot magazine manufactured prior to September 13, 1994, would not be a large capacity ammunition feeding device as defined. You asked about altering such a magazine to accept 14 rounds of 10mm ammunition by modifying the feed lips and possibly the follower. - 2 - Mr. Bardwell The altered magazine would be a large capacity ammunition feeding device. The fact that the materials used to construct the 10mm magazine were made prior to September 13, 994, would not mean that the 10mm magazine was manufactured prior to that date. A new 10mm magazine with the capacity of accepting more than 10 rounds of ammunition would have been manufactured and it would be subject to the prohibition in section 922(w). We trust that the foregoing has been responsive to your inquiry. If you have further questions concerning this matter, please contact us. Sincerely yours, [signed] Curtis H.A. Bartlett Acting Chief, Firearms Technology Branch