Cite as State, Okl. Bar Ass'n v. Floyd, 812 P.2d 378 (Okla. 1991)

                STATE, OKL. BAR ASS'N v. FLOYD  

                 OBAD No. 987, SCBD No. 3740.  
  
                          1991 OK 34  

                    Decided: April 8, 1991.  

                   Supreme Court of Oklahoma  

STATE OF OKLAHOMA, EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, COMPLAINANT, 
 
                              v.   

ALVIN LEE FLOYD, JR. (BEING THE SAME PERSON AS ALVIN L. FLOYD AND
ALVIN LEE FLOYD), RESPONDENT.  
  
                             ORDER  

     Upon complaint of the above-named complainant herein, and
after careful review of the materials filed of record, the Court
finds as follows:  

     Respondent is an attorney-at-law, duly licensed and admitted
to the practice of law in the State of Oklahoma, whose official
address is listed as: 512 Woodbine Drive, Sapulpa, Oklahoma 74066. 

     On September 29, 1989, respondent pleaded guilty to two felony
charges in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Oklahoma, to wit: Possession of an Unregistered
Firearm, in violation of 26 U.S.C. section 5861(d), and Transfer of
an Unregistered Firearm, in violation of 26 U.S.C. section 5861(c).
Upon such plea of guilty, judgment and sentence was entered by the
court which sentenced respondent to imprisonment for a term of
fifteen months, and to a further term of supervised release upon
completion of that term of imprisonment. The said judgment and
sentence was not appealed and has become final.  

     Upon notification of the aforesaid criminal conviction this
Court proceeded under the provisions of Rule 7 of the Rules
Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 O.S. 1981, Ch. 1, App. 1-A.
Respondent was afforded the opportunity to show cause why a final
order of discipline should not be entered, but he declined to do
so.  

     Conviction of the aforesaid felonies demonstrates that
respondent has acted contrary to the prescribed standards of
conduct and his acts have brought discredit upon the legal
profession, and therefore constitute grounds for disciplinary
action.  

     IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that respondent, Alvin
Lee Floyd, Jr., is disbarred from the practice of law in Oklahoma,
and that his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys.  

     All Justices concur.