UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                     DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.                                MISC. CRIMINAL NO. N-90-25(EBB)

BILLISTICS, INCORPORATED                   December 19, 1991
      
                THIRD JOINT MOTION CONCERNING THE
         DISPOSITION OF THE 11 REMAINING SEIZED FIREARMS

     On May 31 1990 and again on June 19, 1990, the United States 
Government and Billistics, Incorporated ("Billistics") filed joint
motions in the captioned matter concerning the disposition of 145
of the 156 firearms in the custody of the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco and Firearms ("BATF"). BATF agents had executed a federal
search warrant and seized from Billistics the 156 firearms listed
on Exhibit 1 accompanying those motions. On June 5 and 19, 1990,
the Court granted the parties' motions and entered orders directing
the BATF to dispose of 145 firearms.

     The parties stated in the second motion that they anticipated
filing a third and final motion addressing the disposition of the
remaining 11 firearms listed as items 25, 27, 43, 54, 57, 58, 59,
88, 89, 104, and 139 in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 is a printout listing
the firearms BATF agents seized from Billistics while executing a
search warrant on July 26, 1989.  Exhibit 1 inadvertently excludes
item number 86.

     The parties now respectfully request in this third motion    
that the Court enter the accompanying proposed order concerning

                              - 2 -

the disposition of the 11 remaining firearms in the BATF's custody.
The parties request that the BATF be permitted to return items 27
and 139 to their registered owners and items 25, 43, 54, 58, 59,
88, 89, and 104 to Billistics as expressed in letter from the
firearms' registered owners that Billistics provided to the
Government.  Copies of those six letters are attached as Exhibit 2. 
The Government understand that the BATF will amend its NFA Registry
to reflect those transfers of firearms to Billistics.

     This motion, like the prior joint motions, is not to be
construed as an admission that Billistics or its officers violated
any federal firearms law or that the agents or its officers
violated any federal firearms law or that the agents of the
Government acted improperly in obtaining a search warrant and
seizing the firearms.  The motion merely seeks an expeditious way
to return the last of the seized firearms.


Respectfully submitted,

ALBERT S. DABROWSKI
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

PETER S. JONGBLOED
ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Federal Bar No CT03192
55 Whitney Avenue
New Haven, Connecticut 06510
(203) 773-2600




Timothy G. Attwood, Esq.
Attorney for Billistics, Inc. 
6 Broadway
Trumbull, Connecticut 06611
(203) 261-3784